Your Savior is…Coming: ‘SAINT MAUD’ & the Search for the Unattainable Orgasm (Originally published for Daily Grindhouse)

2

(Some time ago I wrote this piece for a site that thrusted it behind a paywall so I’m releasing the words because fuck a paywall.)

Her body shivers, thuds to the floor. She’s heavy breathing. A satisfied smile spreads across her face.  

On the surface, one would think that description came straight out of an erotica script like 9 ½ Weeks or served as the inspiration for a YA, coming-of-age novel about a young woman exploring her body for the first time. However, those moments of eruptive, orgasmic pleasure are the key elements of Saint Maud, A24’s recent contribution to the religious horror subgenre that has much more on its, uh, mind than merely God-fearing. “Elevated” horror…literally.

And A24 knew exactly what they were doing when they cheekily touted “Your Savior is Coming” for the film’s marketing campaign tagline. In the film, the titular young, single Maud (Morfydd Clark) is a newly converted, devout Christian that takes her faith a little too seriously. She becomes a caretaker for a dying patient that often mocks her love for God— and by love, I mean, literal, orgasmic episodes (Maudgasms, if you will) in which she claims God is “physically in” her. She quivers; her body weakens. There’s more heavy breathing. And back-arching. And gasping.

We discover little about Maud’s past, aside from a did-she-just-kill-someone? opening flashback, but the sense of sexual repression is overwhelming. Her only sexually penetrative encounter in the film involving an actual human being is visibly unsatisfying (and ends horrifically.) She seems constantly disappointed in said encounters and seems to crave something otherworldly that she looks for in “God.” Her patient Amanda (Jennifer Ehle) even taunts Maud as far as describing her godly obsession as “Heavenly Father’s warm, hard, pulsing— (dick?)” before an offended Maud slaps her across the face.

A surface-level reading of the film would imply that Maud had an unethical past and uses her alleged, newfound faith to restore her “morality,” while a more affronting reading of the film implies that she’s just looking for something that most young, single women are searching for: mind-blowing orgasms to enhance her deepened sexual repression. I’d go as far as to say that Maud’s search for the unattainable O is really what she seeks in God. Maud wants to have sex with God. There. I said it. It’s dirty, probably even offensive to some— but honest. “I’ve got way more important things on my mind than fun,” she boasts…but does she? Lots of hetero women having sex with men are never afforded orgasmic pleasures in life nearly as much as they should be, so who could blame Maud for aiming…higher? 

As a woman in my early thirties myself— with way fewer amazing sexual experiences under my belt than I hoped to have up until this point— I share Maud’s desperation. Awkward, unsatisfying, stingy, inattentive, and/or traumatic encounters with partners can (and probably will) permeate many sexually active people’s experiences— but especially so for young women, in which so often our bodies are more complicated when it comes to reaching that level of euphoria and are too often neglected the proper education or attention to achieve it. Studies suggest almost 60% of us have faked it in our day. Should the hetero ladies of the world have to pull a Maud and turn to God, just to feel…a religious experience during our physical romps?

Maud’s desperation for any connection, let alone a sexually gratifying one, is always met with humiliation. Maud is quietly envious of Amanda’s lovers, yet Amanda teases her relentlessly for it. She jerks off a random dude in the bar bathroom and gets nothing out of it. Attempts at smiling at strangers are one-sided. But the worst of all is her only attempt at actual intercourse with a guy, who she vigorously rides, while her shirt stays on, and who she doesn’t allow to touch her breasts. As her PTSD flashbacks creep in during the encounter, she hops off the guy and ends it. She says no when he tries again, but he rapes her. Maud calls to God and begs to not let her “fall” again, as if she was to blame.

As socially awkward as Maud is— and she is very awkward— none of her dissatisfaction is by fault of her own. Internalizing needs and suppressing sexuality is ingrained in young women from day one of womanhood: if you’re sexually curious and exploratory of your body, you’re told you’ll never grow up to be “wife” material; if you’re shy, choosy, or even abstinent, well, you’ll be inexperienced and boring in the sack when your time does come. Damned if you do and damned if you don’t, etc.  

And at a certain point, when you’ve hit your so-called “sexual prime,” aka prime babymaking years, (so thirties? which is a ridiculously limiting notion to begin with, but bear with me) you’re supposed to have gained enough sexual confidence to know what you like and be able to communicate it to partners. But it’s the trappings of either not wanting to be “intimidating,” domineering— or God forbid, so enthralled in our own desires that we neglect the needs of our male bed cohabitants and get branded as less-than-stellar in bed— that continues to haunt our encounters. It’s true, something inherently selfish comes with the act of sex for both parties, (why else would either of us show up but to hopefully get off) however, even as modern feminism favors “getting hers” and evolves past slut-shaming, hetero sex, by design, still can feel tainted by the bending over backwards (literally) to please the guy, while not wanting to look, act, (or taste) anything less than porn-star perfect. To quote this writer, “I’m not one of those people who blame the patriarchy for everything from office temperature to traffic jams (same), but I do think that from a young age women internalize the idea that being assertive makes you a bossy, controlling bitch. We are taught that we should sacrifice our needs in favor of a man’s— or else risk pushing him away–slash–dying alone.” And the dying alone part is key here, I mean, look how Maud ends up.

Maud is so jaded with her quest for sexual euphoria with men at this point that she’s given up. Never the size queen, she even quips at one of Amanda’s friends that he could have an “8 inch cock” for all she cares, because she knows no quality that any dude could possess has the power to give her the ecstasy she so longs for. Only God gives her that. A coded masturbatory session in her bed, looking visibly horny with scratches all over her body, as if some(thing) was in the bed with her, she’s “fuller” (dirty!) of His love than ever before, and her body levitates off the ground— no other humanly pleasures have ever held a candle to that for her.  

Similarly to how many of us act during that off chance we do finally get that mind-blowing sex we’ve been craving our whole lives, Maud’s behavior becomes erratic. God appears to speak to her and tells her to prepare to prove her devotion to him, and she’s completely whipped. “Can’t shake the feeling that you must’ve saved me for something greater than this.” She douses herself with flammables, burns herself to a crisp, and becomes His martyr, or so she believes. All for some exceptionally holy dick.

Moral to the story: educate yourself, listen to, communicate with, and stop repressing your lady partners when it comes to giving them the best sex they’ve ever had in their lives…and you’ll never have to worry about us turning to God.  

Saint Maud is now streaming on Amazon Prime and Hulu.

She’s Not Imagining Things: ‘The Invisible Man’ & Horror’s History of Believing Women (Originally published for Bloody-Disgusting.com)

2

The original article was published for Bloody-Disgusting.com on March 5, 2020.

img_6527

This editorial contains spoilers. 

“You’re not going out of your mind. You’re slowly and systematically being driven out of your mind.” – Gaslight (1944)

It’s one of the oldest tropes in the book of psychological horror: something unusual/terrible happens; female protagonist gets caught in the crossfire and blamed for it; no one believes said woman and thinks she’s crazy; we, the audience, can see she’s telling the truth and know she should be believed; woman eventually is vindicated or she wins our empathy, at the very least. In the mean time, something, someone, or a pocket of society is actually pulling the strings and the wool over her eyes through cruel mind games, manipulating, policing, abusing, and surveying her mind and body, as she fights that much harder to prove that no, she’s not “crazy”— she’s just being gaslighted.

Continue reading

Metalsploitation: The History of Heavy Metal in the Horror Film (Originally Published for Bloody-Disgusting.com)

0

The original article was published for Bloody-Digusting.com on April 9, 2020.

img_7353

Blood, Satan, the occult, fighting off zombies, social chaos, violence, death— on the surface, these descriptors sound like your average indicators of our favorite horror movies, however, they’re just as representative of horror’s musical cousin equivalent: heavy metal. Just like metal horns and concerts pair so perfectly, these misfit subgenres have been tied together for decades— even coming together as one in the form of “metalsploitation,” (yep, a real term) in which heavy metal music is exploited, satirized, and, most importantly, portrayed lovingly within its own, unique variety of horror films. In honor of the latest heavy metal-horror movie to join the subgenre’s slate, the Alexandra Daddario-starring We Summon the Darkness that’s arriving on VOD this week, we’re looking at each decade of heavy metal’s progression and relationship to the horror genre.

Continue reading

The Devil to Make Her Do It: THE BLACKCOAT’S DAUGHTER & Depictions of Satan and Women in Horror (Originally published for Bloody-Disgusting.com)

0

img_5712

The original article can be found at Bloody-Digusting.com.

This article contains spoilers.

For as far back as the genre’s inception, horror has been pinning its protagonists against the biggest baddy, seducer of sin, and purveyor of evil within existence: Satan. Whether he’s looking to claim an earthly human body or he’s manipulating characters into doing his “work,” horror has been fascinated with the Devil for decades— but especially in regards to his relationships with women and female characters.

Continue reading

How Ari Aster Embraces Horror Conventions to Create His Own Unique Contributions to the Genre (Originally Published for Bloody Disgusting)

0

The original article can be found at Bloody-Disgusting.com.

img_5520

This decade gifted us a plethora of auteur filmmakers that brought something completely fresh to the horror genre, while still managing to derive influence from beloved classics of the past— Jennifer Kent, Issa Lopez, Robert Eggers, Jordan Peele— to name a few. But there’s one creator in particular who has excited myself and many others to next-level degrees with his assuredly eccentric, provocative, ballsy filmmaking style: Ari Aster.   

Continue reading

A Love Letter to Great Indie Horror: THE HOUSE OF THE DEVIL Turns 10 (Originally published for Bloody-Disgusting.com)

0

img_4401

The original post can be found at Bloody-Disgusting.com under “featured editorials.” 

2009 big-budget studio horror was chock-full of lifeless remakes, satirical horror-comedies, and even emerging fresh takes on zombie movies, but slow-burn, ‘80s-inspired nostalgia— which we now see in droves— was never really on the slate…that is, until the masterful combo of a little slasher/Satanic cult/haunted house indie called The House of the Devil came along.

Continue reading

TIGERS ARE NOT AFRAID and the Justified Inclusion of Child Violence within Horror Films (Originally Published for Bloody-Disgusting.com)

0

img_3890

(Original post can be found at Bloody-Disgusting.com. This editorial contains spoilers for Tigers Are Not AfraidIt Chapter TwoThe Nightingale, and The House That Jack Built.)

Issa Lopez’s poignant and revelatory Tigers Are Not Afraid has made such an impact on the horror genre because it differs from so many others films that are given to us: its narrative is told through perspectives that we never see enough of in mainstream cinema; its fantastical elements often add to the film’s sense of peril, as opposed to solely bringing the characters comfort; and, most interestingly, it contains a fearlessness to incorporate grim (but necessary) portrayals of child violence into its storytelling.

Continue reading

10 Films that may have influenced AHS 1984 (Originally Published for Bloody Disgusting)

0

The original post can be found under “Editorials” at Bloody-Disgusting.com.

 

For those of us who have trudged through all 8 seasons of the rollercoaster ride that is American Horror Story (for better and for worse), one subgenre that we’ve been impatiently waiting for Ryan Murphy & Co. to tackle is the 1980s “golden age” of horror: slashers.  After all, there is nothing that AHS delivers more on than the gratuitous sex, gore, campiness, and questionable morality that thrives in the slasher subgenre.  And finally, for the show’s upcoming ninth season, 1984, we’re getting the Friday the 13th season of our dreams.

So before we don our mullets and bust out the campfire songs, let’s look at 10 films that may have inspired AHS 1984.

Continue reading

TINGLE MONSTERS is much more than the first-ever ASMR horror film (Originally published for Nightmarish Conjurings)

0

The original post can be found at NightmarishConjurings.com under “Reviews.”

img_3796

The first-ever ASMR horror film, aptly titled TINGLE MONSTERS, is upon us— but this effective 10-minute short film from writer/director/star Alexandra Serio has much more on its mind than auditory relaxation triggers.

Continue reading

Live from NYC: Q&A with ‘Midsommar’ director, ARI ASTER! (Originally published for Bloody Disgusting)

0

img_3467

“This is a different film- there are things that bolster other things in this cut that I always did miss.”

In a Q&A session after the premiere of his intended director’s cut of Midsommar in New York this weekend (read my review), Ari Aster admitted to feeling “self-indulgent” by releasing this version so soon after the theatrical cut’s original July 3 release to the masses. However, Aster quickly realized how necessary it was for him to show a fuller story of his initial vision.

Continue reading

MIDSOMMAR Director’s Cut Adds (Even More) Depth to the characters REVIEW [Originally published for Bloody Disgusting]

0

img_2554

The original post can be found under “Reviews” at Bloody-Disgusting.com

“This is not releasable,” Ari Aster joked, as he introduced his “more complete” Director’s Cut of Midsommar in New York this past weekend. 

Continue reading

ORPHAN wasn’t perfect, but I still love it 10 years later (Originally published for Bloody Disgusting)

0

The original post was published on July 24, 2019 under “Editorials” at Bloody-Disgusting.com.

img_2974-1

Something is wrong with Esther, alright.

Released on this day 10 years ago, Jaume Collett-Serra’s unique twist on the bad seed subgenre, Orphan, pummeled its way into theaters after weeks of both anticipation and controversy, going on to earn $78 million at the box office over its relatively modest budget. Both influenced by, yet also a subversion of the tropes of previous films such as The Bad Seed, The Omen, and The Good Son— and undoubtedly affecting the coldness within this year’s The ProdigyOrphan is one of the more memorable psychological horror efforts we were given in 2009.

Continue reading